Outcomes of renal transplantation in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy in India.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the course of renal transplant in patients with immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) from India. While the natural history of IgAN in the Indian context is rapidly progressive, the post-transplant course remains speculative. AIM: To study the graft survival in renal transplant recipients whose native kidney disease was IgAN and the incidence and correlates of recurrent disease. SETTINGS AND DESIGNS: Retrospective case control study from a Nephrology unit of a large tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The outcomes of 56 transplant patients (58 grafts) with biopsy-proven IgAN and of 116 patients without IgAN or diabetic nephropathy, transplanted during the same period were analyzed. Correlates of biopsy-confirmed recurrent disease were determined. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Means were analyzed by Student's t test and Mann-Whitney test; proportions were determined by Chi-square analysis and graft survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier. RESULTS: Five-year graft survival for IgA patients was not significantly different from that in the reference group (90% and 79%, P = 0.6). During a mean follow-up of 42 months (range, 1-144), 28 event graft biopsies were required in 20 grafts of IgAN. Histological recurrence was diagnosed in five of the 20 available biopsies (25%) after a mean duration of 28 months. Recurrence did not correlate with donor status, HLA B35 and A2, recipient age, gender or immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation is an appropriate treatment modality for IgA nephropathy patients with end-stage renal disease in India, despite the potential for recurrent disease. The posttransplant course is an indolent one when compared to the malignant pretransplant phase.

Spectrum of severe chronic kidney disease in India: a clinicopathological study.

BACKGROUND: The healthcare burden due to chronic kidney disease has increased worldwide in the past decade. Elucidating the aetiology of chronic kidney disease may help in identifying strategies for prevention, both in the population and the Individual patient. Only a clinicopathological study can define the exact spectrum of chronic kidney disease since epidemiological studies have not shown a consistent aetiological profile. The histological evidence used to support the diagnosis varies with the degree to which renal biopsy is done. Renal biopsy is the gold standard in making an aetiological diagnosis in renal failure, but as a diagnostic tool in chronic kidney disease it is underutilized. METHODS: This prospective study done at Christian Medical College, Vellore in southern India from 1998 to 2003 aimed to determine the aetiological profile of severe chronic kidney disease by analysing renal biopsies. The value of pre-renal biopsy clinical Judgement in predicting the histological diagnosis was also assessed. Patients with diabetic nephropathy were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-seven patients had evidence of chronic kidney disease as evidenced on biopsy as well as on clinical parameters. Three hundred and twenty-two of these patients (70.5%) had glomerulonephritis as the histological diagnosis. Fifty-five (12%) had Interstitial nephritis, 30 (6.6%) had hypertensive arteriosclerosis and 28 (6.1%) had metabolic nephropathies. The positive predictive value of a pre-biopsy clinical diagnosis in predicting interstitial nephritis was very low (33%). A large number of patients clinically diagnosed to have chronic interstitial nephritis had other aetiologies of chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: Glomerulonephritis was the most common cause of chronic kidney disease, not including diabetic nephropathy, followed by interstitial disease and benign arterionephrosclerosis. In patients with unidentified severe chronic kidney disease, renal biopsy provided an aetiological diagnosis.